antagonist

[..] the conditions of philosophy, being the truths that it holds, are always contemporary. That is, within the turmoil of time the philosopher construes new concepts, he can not let his guard down, content himself with what is are already there, contributing to maintaining the established order, without falling immediately into that which has become the worst menace for his discipline: its absorption, its digestion, by academics. The anti-philosopher, we recall, is a philosopher who is a political militant, who in general hates the established powers and its servants; an aesthetic, who goes before the most improbable creations; a lover, who knows his live can be turned upside down by a man or a woman; a scholar, who frequents the unfolding of the most violent paradoxes within science. And who, within this effervescence, within this in-disposition, this rebellion, produces his cathedrals of ideas.